feat(agi-governance): AGI Governance Framework — 8,200-word multi-stakeholder strategic report with 6-pillar adaptive framework
Report: GOV-AGI-FWK-001 — Governing the Transition to Artificial General Intelligence
Audience: Board of Directors, C-Suite, Senior Engineering Leadership, CRO, General Counsel
Format: Markdown in XML tags (<strategic_reasoning>, <title>, <abstract>, <content>)
Data Object (AGI_GOVERNANCE):
- Strategic Reasoning: methodological synthesis (technology governance theory, ERM, IR theory)
- Section 1 — Executive Summary: $13.2-22.1T GDP impact, regulatory discontinuity, existential risk
- Section 2 — Capability Landscape: 6 frontier benchmarks (ARC-AGI-2 28.9%, SWE-bench 72.7%),
compute projections (5×10^25→5×10^27 FLOP), AGI timeline (2028-2036, central: 2031)
- Section 3 — Six-Pillar Framework with 5-level maturity model per pillar:
P1: Capability Monitoring ($680K) | P2: Alignment Assurance ($1,420K)
P3: Economic Preparedness ($1,180K) | P4: Regulatory Readiness ($720K)
P5: Org. Transformation ($520K) | P6: International Engagement ($280K)
- Section 4 — Investment Strategy: $4.8M/24mo, ROI 6-14x, NPV $38-72M
- Section 5 — Risk Assessment: 6 risks (3 critical, 3 high), $28-65M aggregate exposure
- Section 6 — Implementation Roadmap: 8 quarters Q2 2026-Q1 2028, 8 success metrics
Frameworks: NIST AI RMF 1.0, ISO 42001:2023, EU AI Act, OECD AI Principles,
Bletchley Declaration, Seoul Commitments, US EO 14110
API Endpoints (11 + parameterised pillar):
/api/agi-governance, /meta, /reasoning, /executive-summary, /capability-landscape,
/pillars, /pillar/:id, /investment, /risks, /roadmap, /maturity
HTML: agi-governance.html — dark-theme executive dashboard with maturity bars,
pillar cards, risk cards, roadmap timeline, investment visualisations
Zero console errors, 8.17s page load
Verification: All 12 endpoints HTTP 200, HTML renders correctly