ruff

3a5f1d46 - [red-knot] Make' Type::in_type_expression()' exhaustive for Type::KnownInstance (#16836)

[red-knot] Make' Type::in_type_expression()' exhaustive for Type::KnownInstance (#16836) <!-- Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing, please consider the following: - Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.) - Does this pull request include a descriptive title? - Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues? --> ## Summary fixes #15048 We want to handle more types from Type::KnownInstance ## Test Plan Add tests for each type added explicitly in the match --------- Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>