llvm-project

1101b767 - [Clang] Implement CWG3005 Function parameters should never be name-independent (#138245)

[Clang] Implement CWG3005 Function parameters should never be name-independent (#138245) We already attempted to implement this (it was the intent of the paper), in that parameters were never considered name-independent. However, we failed to check that any previously found parameter declaration was also name-independent. Note that, as worded, the current resolution is insufficient (I wrote to CWG with better wording), but there is some consensus on the design outcome. Fixes #136373