BTS and 'init' patterns for big (illegal) integer types (#165361)

Commit

7 days ago

[X86] Add test coverage showing BT/BTC/BTR/BTS and 'init' patterns for big (illegal) integer types (#165361) Beginning of an investigation into how we can better handle bit twiddling of _BitInt types

References

#165361 - [X86] Add test coverage showing BT/BTC/BTR/BTS and 'init' patterns for big (illegal) integer types

Author

RKSimon

Parents

d51dcf92

llvm-project 25452093 - [X86] Add test coverage showing BT/BTC/BTR/BTS and 'init' patterns for big (illegal) integer types (#165361)

llvm-project
25452093 - [X86] Add test coverage showing BT/BTC/BTR/BTS and 'init' patterns for big (illegal) integer types (#165361)