[Clang] Remove the wrong assumption when rebuilding SizeOfPackExprs for constraint normalization (#115120)
In 463a4f150, we assumed that all the template argument packs are of
size 1 when normalizing a constraint expression because I mistakenly
thought those packs were obtained from their injected template
parameters. This was wrong because we might be checking constraints when
instantiating a friend declaration within a class template
specialization, where the parent class template is specialized with
non-dependent template arguments.
In that sense, we shouldn't assume any pack size nor expand anything in
such a scenario. Moreover, there are no intermediate (substituted but
unexpanded) AST nodes for template template parameters, so we have to
special-case their transformations by looking into the instantiation
scope instead of extracting anything from template arguments.
Fixes #115098