llvm-project

e6917e95 - [clang][NFC] Add test for CWG1898 "Use of “equivalent” in overload resolution" (#113439)

[clang][NFC] Add test for CWG1898 "Use of “equivalent” in overload resolution" (#113439) [CWG1898](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/1898.html) Use of “equivalent” in overload resolution ==================== [P1787R6](https://wg21.link/p1787r6): > CWG1898 is resolved by explicitly using the defined term parameter-type-list. Except that now it's called non-object-parameter-type-list, which is defined in [dcl.fct] [p8](https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.fct#8) and [p4](https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.fct#8). As for the wording, the first sentence [\_N4140\_.[over.dcl]/1](https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/n4140/over.dcl#1) where the word "equivalent" was used: > Two function declarations of the same name refer to the same function if they are in the same scope and have equivalent parameter declarations ([over.load]). was replaced with what is now known as "corresponding overloads", defined in [[basic.scope.scope]/4](https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.scope#scope-4). The definition is present in P1787R6, but it's hard to reference, because the "corresponding overloads" term was coined later.