next.js
da0cbcce - Add not-found.js / notFound() links to Status Codes section (#88332)

Commit
1 day ago
Add not-found.js / notFound() links to Status Codes section (#88332) <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation - Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR. - Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # --> ### What? Add links to the helpful [Status Codes section of the `loading.js` docs page](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/file-conventions/loading#status-codes) from the [`not-found.js`](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/file-conventions/not-found) and [`notFound()`](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/functions/not-found) docs pages ### Why? To avoid misunderstandings that the streamed HTTP 200 responses are negatively affecting SEO, as posited in such articles: - https://matthewmorek.com/journal/how-to-fix-next-js-notfound-returning-200-ok-with-app-router-and-suspense It is mentioned in the `loading.js` docs as well as @ztanner's comment here: - https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/45801#issuecomment-2104816811 But not yet on the `not-found.js` or `notFound()` docs pages: <img width="1439" height="629" alt="Screenshot 2026-01-09 at 17 16 24" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5a2c9edf-1c28-4ae5-ab6e-08ac5ea703f7" /> <img width="1440" height="538" alt="Screenshot 2026-01-09 at 17 16 41" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e83d3dbd-b175-4375-8aa2-311744d2daf2" /> ### How? Add some small edits ### Alternatives considered 1. Duplicating the Status Codes content to the `not-found.js` and `notFound()` pages so it's accessible in all 3 places 1. Copying and pasting the whole section 2. Making it a "partial" or "include" which can be used in both places 2. Moving the "Status Codes" (and maybe "SEO") section(s) out of the `loading.js` page into a separate docs page But both of those options require a bit more work and thinking. --------- Co-authored-by: Joseph <sephxd1234@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Joseph <joseph.chamochumbi@vercel.com>
Author
Parents
Loading