Fix scrolling on navigation in app (#48863)
## What?
When investigating #48852 I found that when there's a `segmentPath` set
in the `focusAndScrollRef` it would compare that entire path with the
`segmentPath` of the layout-router. This logic works in cases where the
entire page is rendered but doesn't take into account cases where for
example a suspense boundary is triggered below the common layout.
Because of the order `useEffect` is run in we can already assume that if
a more specific match existed it would have scrolled there. As that is
not the case in e.g. #48852 it ended up opting out of scrolling
entirely. In order to fix that the logic needs to be different, it needs
to check if the layout-router's `segmentPath` matches, if it matches
every level then we can apply scrolling in that layout-router.
## How?
Implemented the opposite of the current logic, running `.every` on the
layout-router segmentPath instead of on the router provided segmentPath.
Fixes #48852
Fixes NEXT-1053
Related PR #48862
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
