turbo-tasks: replace async resolve fns with custom Future types (ResolveRawVcFuture, ResolveVcFuture, ToResolvedVcFuture) (#91554)
### What?
Replace the `async fn resolve()`, `async fn
resolve_strongly_consistent()`, and `async fn to_resolved()` methods on
`RawVc`, `Vc<T>`, and `OperationVc<T>` with hand-written custom `Future`
implementations, following the existing `ReadRawVcFuture` pattern.
New types:
- **`ResolveRawVcFuture`** (`raw_vc.rs`) — core implementation, replaces
`async fn resolve_inner()`
- **`ResolveVcFuture<T>`** (`vc/mod.rs`) — typed wrapper over
`ResolveRawVcFuture`, returned by `Vc::resolve()`
- **`ResolveOperationVcFuture<T>`** (`vc/operation.rs`) — typed wrapper,
returned by `OperationVc::resolve()`
- **`ToResolvedVcFuture<T>`** (`vc/mod.rs`) — typed wrapper, returned by
`Vc::to_resolved()`
All new future types expose a `.strongly_consistent()` builder method,
enabling `resolve_strongly_consistent()` to be replaced by
`.resolve().strongly_consistent()` at call sites.
`ReadRawVcFuture` is also updated to delegate its phase-1 resolve loop
to `ResolveRawVcFuture` instead of duplicating the logic.
`std::task::ready!` is used throughout to simplify poll implementations.
Also adds `#[inline(never)]` to `ReadRawVcFuture::poll` and
`ResolveRawVcFuture::poll` to avoid inlining large poll implementations
into every await site.
### Why?
Performance, binary size, and improved API ergonomics:
- The hand-written `Future` pattern (already used by `ReadRawVcFuture`)
gives the compiler more predictable, smaller code than the state
machines generated for `async fn`. The `#[inline(never)]` attributes on
`poll` prevent large poll bodies from being duplicated at every await
site, which the async desugaring otherwise allows.
- The new builder API (`.resolve().strongly_consistent()`) is more
composable and removes the need for separate `_strongly_consistent`
method variants, reducing the number of methods on
`RawVc`/`Vc`/`OperationVc`.
- Having `ReadRawVcFuture` delegate to `ResolveRawVcFuture` removes the
duplicated resolve loop and ensures both paths stay in sync.
### How?
- `ResolveRawVcFuture` stores `current: RawVc`, `read_output_options:
ReadOutputOptions`, `strongly_consistent: bool`, and `listener:
Option<EventListener>`. Its `poll` replicates the loop from the old
`resolve_inner` using `try_read_task_output` / `try_read_local_output`.
- On `Err(listener)` from a `try_*` call, the listener is stored in
`self.listener` and `Poll::Pending` is returned. At the top of the loop,
`ready!(poll_listener(...))` re-polls it and short-circuits if still
pending.
- Consistency is downgraded to `Eventual` after the first `TaskOutput`
hop, matching the previous behavior.
- `strongly_consistent: true` keeps the
`SUPPRESS_EVENTUAL_CONSISTENCY_TOP_LEVEL_TASK_CHECK` suppression across
all polls (same logic as `ReadRawVcFuture`).
- `ReadRawVcFuture` now holds a `ResolveRawVcFuture` for phase 1 and
drives it via `Pin::new(&mut self.resolve).poll(cx)` before proceeding
to the cell read in phase 2. This eliminates the duplicated loop that
previously existed in both types.
- Typed wrappers (`ResolveVcFuture<T>`, `ResolveOperationVcFuture<T>`,
`ToResolvedVcFuture<T>`) delegate `poll` to the inner
`ResolveRawVcFuture` and map the output to the appropriate typed result.
- `OperationVc::resolve_strongly_consistent()` is removed; 16 call sites
updated to `.resolve().strongly_consistent()`.
- All new types implement `Unpin` and are exported from `lib.rs`.
- `std::task::ready!` is used in all `poll` implementations to reduce
boilerplate.
No behavioral changes — this is a pure implementation refactor.
### Binary size impact
A release build (`pnpm swc-build-native --release`) was measured before
and after the branch changes on the same merge-base commit (`a41bef94`):
| | Size |
|---|---|
| Base (`a41bef94`, before branch) | 199,690,656 bytes (~190.4 MB) |
| Branch (`6f7846f9`, after changes) | 199,252,384 bytes (~190.0 MB) |
| **Difference** | **−438,272 bytes (−428 KB, −0.22%)** |
The branch produces a slightly smaller binary. The reduction comes
primarily from the `#[inline(never)]` attributes preventing large `poll`
bodies from being duplicated at every await site.
---------
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <sokra@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>