PR #1858 fix: sectioner does not consider separator length

fix: sectioner does not consider separator length #1858

awalker4 merged 3 commits into main from scanny/sectioner-considers-separator

scanny changed the base branch from main to scanny/chunk-by-title-is-rude 2 years ago

scanny force pushed from 3ec0d60e to 4491f36b 2 years ago

scanny force pushed from 4491f36b to c6b558c8 2 years ago

scanny force pushed from 8198dc8c to 4d93ac59 2 years ago

scanny marked this pull request as ready for review 2 years ago

scanny force pushed from 4d93ac59 to 7ed01c7e 2 years ago

scanny force pushed from 7ed01c7e to 08bd2139 2 years ago

Base automatically changed from scanny/chunk-by-title-is-rude to main 2 years ago

scanny force pushed from 08bd2139 to fa158e8d 2 years ago

scanny requested a review from

Coniferish 2 years ago

scanny assigned

scanny 2 years ago

scanny force pushed from fa158e8d to 640314b8 2 years ago

Coniferish commented on 2023-10-26

fix: sectioner does not consider separator length

9636d244

scanny force pushed from 640314b8 to 72cfe887 2 years ago

scanny force pushed from 72cfe887 to 20bb5a07 2 years ago

qued commented on 2023-10-26

scanny force pushed from 8c1141c8 to 400cac43 2 years ago

chore: add CHANGELOG entry for this PR

3a8de753

fix: small documentation fixes

405a2cd5

scanny force pushed from 400cac43 to 405a2cd5 2 years ago

Coniferish approved these changes on 2023-10-26

awalker4 merged f273a7cb into main 2 years ago

awalker4 deleted the scanny/sectioner-considers-separator branch 2 years ago

Reviewers

Coniferish

qued

Assignees

scanny

Labels

None yet

Milestone

No milestone