Prefer `itertools.pairwise()` over `zip()` for successive pairs (`RUF007`) #3501
Have to implement reviewer feedback
224d82fe
Add checks for zip(a[:-1], a[1:])
ebecaf41
Add snapshots and such
e65a79d4
Formatting
505045b0
Elide explicit lifetime
b85a319d
Restrict target version to 3.10+
58f81cd4
Implement reviewer comments
3923f4df
Add Option<i64> instead of Result. Change successive pair definition
9e9e8fbf
Remove Rule pointer
6aba28ef
Remove redundant slice_end field
f93f818c
Minor tweaks
96390c2c
Avoid steps
ac36c9c0
charliermarsh
changed the title Prefer `itertools.pairwise()` over `zip()` for successive pairs Prefer `itertools.pairwise()` over `zip()` for successive pairs (`RUF007`) 2 years ago
Assignees
No one assigned
Login to write a write a comment.
Login via GitHub